Jun 13, 2016 when you say "richest man on earth" are you referring to Bill Gates? Or the Rothschilds who own every bank in the world?
Jun 13, 2016 Bill Gates owns more than 500 trillion dollars? no, he doesn't, therefore he's not the wealthiest man on earth. Check below
Jun 13, 2016 President Obama is the commander and chief of the world's strongest and most lethal military. Bill Gates, Larry Page, Warren Buffet and Tim Cook are all citizens of his country.
Jun 13, 2016 Paranoid about what? Living in a country where there are more mass shootings than there are days in a year? Because we're almost there.
Jun 13, 2016 A Rothschild. "Because the family's wealth is private, it's difficult to ascertain its net worth – estimates range from $1 billion to a staggering $700 trillion, split between legions of descendants." Like they own banks and s--- and why is their wealth kept private? I don't know for sure and it gets a bit tinfoil-y but they own banks and keep their wealth private. I'd try post links here but really couldn't be f----- going through 90% tinfoil conspiracy theory drivel. Do a bit of googling and you'll see. Basically the forbes list is also meant for representing singular people. Not families/businesses/corporations. The Rothschild family is the richest in the world and own a ridiculous amount of companies and assets. yeah but like Obama cant hack/dox/expose me, while Bill Gates has pics of my d-ck on some file storage server somewhere. #spooky
Jun 13, 2016 lol @ changing your tone. You said something else first. Absolute s--- tier poster and completely worthless
Jun 13, 2016 i got one fact wrong thats wasnt the point i was trying to make know when to take the L son
Jun 13, 2016 Not denying the wealth of the family, im saying in terms of individual wealth, because the family has spread out. But yeah, i said richest 'person' not richest group. None of them as individuals can claim gates's wealth. Not that, that rant about white history. We were only bought by the Europeans, our fellow blacks were the one's that sold us.
Jun 13, 2016 I've heard from witness reports that there was more than one shooter but it hasn't been confirmed, has it?
Jun 13, 2016 I'd imagine it would be after victim and ballistic reports are finished. To be 1 shooter and put down over 100 people, he'd have to be carrying over 250 pounds of ammunition in his vest, and if he's a phenomenal shot he might hit over 100 ppl. We're talking about a fat, out of shape, ex security guard here. There are reports of some victims having 11 bullets removed. 1 shooter can't do that kind of damage to 100's of people running around in a dark nightclub. It's just not possible.
Jun 13, 2016 Wasn't he in there shooting for hours? That's how he got so many victims. I haven't heard anything about a second shooter.
