Mar 22, 2021No, I completely understand that and I was never talking about a serial killer like Ted Bundy. I'm just saying that anyone who is convicted of murder is "guilty by undeniable proof" by definition because that's how our (flawed) system works. You need to be sure beyond reasonable doubt and I believe that literally 100% of the jury has to agree in most (all?) places here for serious crimes like murder. So that would mean that anyone convicted of murder would be treated the same no matter the nature of the crime and how good/bad the evidence was or how long the jury deliberated. We need that appeals process because people can get a lazy or bad or racist jury/judge/prosecutor/lawyer.
- May 7, 2025
-
Mar 22, 2021
“people shouldn’t be allowed to appeal their convictions” is literally a fascist takeEnigma, Ordinary Joel, Sign Language and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
Ordinary Joel, Ricky, Guma and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
People seem to be more focused on revenge/avenge than prevention & rehabilitation.Enigma, Ordinary Joel, Proto and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
Wait till u guys find out the sexual preferences of the people you trust to carry out these executionsOrdinary Joel, Sign Language, hargydon and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
Ofc they should execute ppl. But not with the current system
there should be a redefining of “beyond reasonable doubt” to probably beyond any doubt. And for those ppl for sure they should be put down. Zero question
ppl who f--- childern should be killed. With no hesitation...and not painless death, they should run a game show where winners win based on who could come up with the most painful way to k--- child rapiests. Im talking brutal brutal deaths. Zero doubts in my mindMichael Myers, Guma, fezzer and 1 other person like this.(This ad goes away when signing up) -
Mar 21, 2021
Ordinary Joel, Alpha, JMG and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 21, 2021
Ordinary Joel, Alpha, DKC and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 20, 2021
Whether a killer or someone who caused way too much harm and damage to the point he/she deserves to be put down, is sentenced to death by the system or someone takes it upon themselves to go after such individuals and end their lives, there's no denying that Karma is real and what goes around comes around no matter how long it takes. You reap what you sow.Last edited: Mar 20, 2021Michael Myers, Ordinary Joel, JMG and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 20, 2021
https://innocenceproject.org/
Although I have a woodchipper specifically for pedophiles, other than that, f--- capital punishment.Ordinary Joel, JMG, DKC and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 19, 2021
Save the Children was most definitely a co-op with Qanon... their protest were 100% Qanoners as shown by all coverage of it... everyone that used #Savethechildren on my timelines also used the #wwg1wga hashtags.
Cuties was definitely a naive program mistake by Netflix... just like Toddlers in Tiaras and Dance Moms and Honey Boo-Boo and all that other exploitive bs that TLC or whatever have cashed in on for redneck weirdos forever...Ordinary Joel, DKC, Enigma and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 19, 2021
Ordinary Joel, BIGFOOT, Worm and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 19, 2021
I think the argument has to be more specific though and it all depends on the situation.
Also I think maybe a more harsh death sentence could deter crime. I am not surprised at current studies because these people don't wanna live anyway. I'm sure they don't mind an easy way out.
Also I am proud of people being able to debate like adults so far.Ordinary Joel, JEB, BIGFOOT and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 19, 2021
I don’t think it’s morally/ethically indefensible for certain crimes but in practice, yes, I oppose it. In general, I would like a criminal justice system that is far more focused on rehabilitation than punishment. The death penalty just seems inconsistent with that idea.
I’ve even began to question my position on life imprisonment. Some studies show that 20-25 year max sentencing is really all that’s necessary to deter individuals from committing crimes. It largely has to do with age: if you’re convicted of armed robbery at 25, the chances of you committing that crime again at the age of 45-50 is very low. I’d need to see more data on this though to fully embrace it.Ordinary Joel, hargydon, DKC and 1 other person like this. -
Mar 19, 2021
no,
It would be great to see paedophile's killed.
But you would have people trying to frame people to get them killed.Ordinary Joel, Alpha, Reed Richards and 1 other person like this.(This ad goes away when signing up) - May 7, 2025
-
Mar 22, 2021
Ordinary Joel, Sign Language and Worm like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
I'm really not trying to moralize here—there are people like child rapists and serial killers and war criminals who I think deserve to die. But I can think they deserve to die while also thinking that we shouldn't give the government the power to k--- anyone. I'd rather just lock them up for life than give the government any more legal outlets to murder people.
I'm not worried about these people getting killed I'm worried about the death penalty being used against innocent people.Enigma, Ordinary Joel and Michael Myers like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
Enigma, Ordinary Joel and Worm like this. -
Mar 22, 2021
Does the punishment of death really prevent people from committing murder?
like I’m not not killing people because I’m scared of the death penalty, I’m not killing people because it’s not the right thing to do and is completely immoral/horrifying.
people who k--- people don’t have the compass or mental stability to think like that. And will k--- regardlessLast edited: Mar 23, 2021Enigma, Ordinary Joel and DKC like this.