Jun 18, 2015 we already discussed that usa economy isn't as "bad off" as it seems, so don't see what purpose repeating yourself does thats why i asked where you are from, you obviously don't live here or you would have a little more understanding it's easy to judge how another countries economy is doing , when you don't live there and experience it
Jun 18, 2015 It's much easier to judge a country's economy, when you have the appropriate/necessary knowledge (that is backed up by multiple degrees) for doing so.
Jun 18, 2015 yet your extensive knowledge has zero application because understanding how the numbers work, doesnt mean you understand the daily domestic life, which is my entire point and takes us back to my children posts
Jun 18, 2015 did you even read the link res posted? or are you too busy trying to show off that you have a degree or five?
Jun 18, 2015 So, now you're making the presumption that I've studied only how numbers work and I somehow haven't studied how those numbers relate to/affect everyday life of citizens and other fields. So you presume I've studied what? Economics (excluding mainstream)? Public financing? Social sciences? If you think any of those are only about numbers (and not connecting them to "real life" consequences), then you have absolutely no understanding of those disciplines. Not to mention you have shown, that you have zero grasp on how a government works or how intricate and interdisciplinary it really gets. Your argument started with the level of debt, which I easily responded to. Then, I guess you found you couldn't argument that and you made a turn that had nothing to do with debt, by talking about taxes. To which I figured you perhaps thought about the connection between taxes and debt and responded correspondingly. But no, then you went on to talk about taxes in the sense of social injustice. To which I clearly demonstrated the conflict which it had with your initial statement (your praise for having a private sector businessman run a government). IDK why I'm even arguing here. To the benefit of your statement I'll add, that yes mainstream economics has gone too far with applying mathematics whereas it is now not about economy (so called "real life"), but about creating the fanciest mathematic model you can think of. But that has nothing to do with my claims.
Jun 18, 2015 i can't tell if you agree with me or disagree is this the L you were looking for @cmmn.sns?
Jun 18, 2015 The only L-s I'm looking for are part of the acronym LOL. I can see that you are not able to tell/understand a lot of things. But I guess give it a couple of years, perhaps time will be able to heal those shortcomings.
Jun 18, 2015 i just find it hard to believe you don't agree with anything i said, regardless of your expert level analysis.. i mean it was almost as good as this:
Jun 18, 2015 he's run his father business into the ground several times. he supports american labor but his company produces their clothing products in china. he paid actors 50 dollars to cheer him on at his announcement ceremony. can i go on?
Jun 18, 2015 Don't even respond anymore. His argument consists of running around in circles with you and ending with an immature a--- smiley. It really isn't worth it lol
Jun 18, 2015 at any rate, all donald trump does is basically prevent any republican candidate from winning the election so he's good in my books #feelthebern
Jun 18, 2015 that's the LITERAL PROOF I WANTED RIGHT HERE, your just like any other basic liberal, you don't care about the actual issues, you just wanna be a hero and be against anything "republican" it's pathetic and sickening
Jun 18, 2015 actually I'm revoking @cmmn.sns L and giving to you @Fazers you need it much more, in fact ill upgrade you
Jun 18, 2015 wrong. i agree with republicans on a few issues. but the actual field of people vying for the republican nominee is a cesspool of uneducated and uninformed politicians, along with a talk show host, and now a billionaire who was born into his fortune. bernie sanders is my optimal choice for the 2016 election, but hillary clinton is my more logical choice. unless a republican nominee aligns themselves with more things i agree with than either of those, i'll gladly vote for them. until then
