Oct 8, 2017

No s--- dude. Do you think I live under a rock??? But they've been saying this same dumb s--- for 25 years and still haven't done a d--- thing and they won't do a d--- thing. Therye all bark no bite

 

Oct 8, 2017

I just don't want a nuclear war because that's what exactly will happen when we go to war with NK.... Hopefully China and Russia don't want to get involved after we open those floodgates because than h--- will literally break loose.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Was bound to happen. North Korea were riding off the goodwill of the rest of the world but it's gotten to the point where they are now a threat and can make threats to other nations.

China are somewhat affiliated with N.Korea but neither them nor russia want any reckless narcissistic kid throwing nukes around. The only reason we haven't gone to war is collateral damage, but the longer we wait, the greater the potential collateral damage becomes.

 

Oct 8, 2017

China has already stated that if NK made the first move and attacked the US or its allies than China would not have NK's back but if the US or its allies were to make the first strike than China will get involved and come to NK aid. and even if we do go to war with just NK than best believe China and Russia will be conducting proxy wars just like what rusisia and the US are doing in Syria right now

 

Oct 8, 2017

N.Korea isn't a russian interest. They have no reason to help them.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Except for the fact that Russia and the US hate eachother weve been in a new cold war with them since they seized Georgia back in 08 and then Crimea in like 13. If they can find a way to get the upper hand on the US than they will.

 

Oct 8, 2017

When we "blow NK off the map" with nukes Putin and Xi will step n and be like "you went too far" and that's the point when all h--- breaks loose.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Korea is a reckless wildcard that frankly nobody wants. The russians don't give a d---, and if they become a world threat like isis, they might even lend the americans a hand.

 

Oct 8, 2017

They've been threatening us with nukes for years. That’s nothing new. What is new is them threatening specific U.S. locations (Guam) & shooting missiles over Japan. Those actions were in response to Trump.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Wow, the anti-trump narrative is like total brainwashing isn't it.

The missiles fired over japan were test missiles. The reason they made specific threats now is not because trump pisses them off more than obama. It's cause they simply weren't capable of sending any type of missile much less a nuke over that distance in the past. The threat of korea to America has never been an immediate one, but rather a potential one. In other words, what Iran wasn't, N.Korea is.

The more they allow them to continue development of their intercontinetal missles, the closer they'll get to being able to actually hit america with a nuke. And that's why trump is in a position that none of the past leaders were. Because now Korea is very close to being that threat. And nuclear war is pretty much mutual destruction.

Bush was a decade too early.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Wait a second, so N. Korea threatening to attack Guam/firing balistic missiles over Japan immediately after Trump’s “fire & fury” comments (among many others) is just a mere coincidence to you?

 

Oct 8, 2017

huh?
They tested the first missle BEFORE trump made any statements.

Also, do remember that N. Korea have made threats before trumps fire and fury statements. They threatened to go to war over the 'dignity of our leader' because of some insults on the d--- media. So don't try to make trump look like the aggressor here.

 

Oct 8, 2017

Trump’s “fire & fury” (and various other) comments came in early August. N. Korea fired its first missile over Japan in late August & then fired another one in early September. Trump’s comments via Twitter & speeches are what pushed N. Korea to fire these missiles. I’m not saying N. Korea haven’t made threats in the past, they obviously have, but trump added fuel to the fire by joining in & turning a sensitive situation into a d-ck measuring contest.

 

Oct 8, 2017

You still can't put trump at fault for this. The missile launch was a test, meaning it;s something they would have had to do eventually. Why wouldn't they just launch the missile the day trump made his comments?

 

Oct 8, 2017

Uhhhh...



These events are too close together to be independent from each other. Pretty much everyone who pays attention to foreign affairs acknowledged the test as a response to Trump’s remarks.

 

Oct 8, 2017

NK been firing missilies out their a--- for decades, not like it's ramped up because of trump, what a tinfoil theory.

all you paranoid brainlets need to f---ing get over it too. war wont happen. NK just doesn't want US to invade, they want to stay a "rogue" nation not part of the UN. Their method is nuclear deterence, they build a heap of missilies and nukes so that paranoid america will go "ok we can't iraq, afghanistan, libya, syria this country... cause they could nuke our homeland while we invade. let it just be rogue"

 

Oct 9, 2017

This is true and that's why the international community doesn't take North Korean threats overly seriously in most cases. A non-autistic U.S president would've let this die down a long time ago but Trump seems to want to have the last word

I do wonder though just how far will NK be allowed to advance it's arsenal before world leaders start saying yea na hold up there m8

 

Oct 9, 2017

I felt the past 2 or so years that it will happen soon, big push on renewable energy and saving the earth for global warming. not sure but feel like a nuke or missile tests every week are probs not good for the environment so theyll crack down on it soon