Nov 18, 2015 last post then i will leave hopefully someone else back me up as hard as this sounds, the risk wont increase...the people who says this are misinformed people who never lived in an arabic country so they dont know how easy it is to hop on a plane and go there...you creating this monster and feeding it and forcing yourself to believe refugees are the problem now these refugees who got in, that supposedly wanna k--- you...where will they get the bombs? from who? from where? other refugees? will parts of it be shoved up their a----s as they get in? or will they create a lab within the camp? mate, think if you were in their position...what if your little sister was the one wanting to get in or your mom? will you be singing this tone? i doubt it
Nov 18, 2015 There's such a superiority argument at the base of all these refugee decliners. Just scratch the religious component for a second, because you could argue people are inherently evil (even without religion). Would you really think you're not partially responsible for the mayhem in countries with less wealth and safety because of supporting your countries often selfish and imperialist foreign policies?
Nov 18, 2015 I understand what people like you stand for but you have to look at it from my perspective. I live in a densely populated area of new york, one of the first places these terrorists are going to try to hit first is new york. Of course the risk increases. There is bound to be on bad seed in the batch. If you can tell me with 100% certainty that all these people are genuinely running from isis or what have you, And i mean every single one of those 30,000, i would gladly take them in. but sadly thats not the case. Thats where the risk is involved. they can make bombs by going to a local home depot and making a pipe bomb. these terrorist can do damage in a number of ways tho.
Nov 18, 2015 Blame your country for invading other countries on false charges of WMD first. Let's not forget all the west has WMD's but no one ofcourse flinches an eye, because the west has 'superior' morality and judgement. Just stop talking to me if you really think Obama is the evil guy fam. You're prolly raised to think that way.
Nov 18, 2015 regardless of what you think, Saddam was an evil man too. Taking him out wasn't a bad move by any means. Its just that the us military left iraq way before it was ready to defend itself. And no i can think for my self.
Nov 18, 2015 you're so indoctrinated.. i am scared to evin begin the deprogramming edit: agreed Saddam was evil btw
Nov 18, 2015 It's really like yall believe your countries are infallible.. why does no one ever question their OWN people's decisions.. why does the bad guy always HAVE to be an 'alien', a foreigner... why do so many people play the blame game? Just to relieve yourself of any responsibility and accountability??? That's what's destroying our world fam.. we need to take more responsibility for our own bad decisions and actions
Nov 18, 2015 yeah the middle east was problem that was provoked by the west. It just obama made the situation worse when iraq could've been a safe haven instead of a warzone.
Nov 18, 2015 oh come on the iraq invade is DIRECTLY the reason for the region instability, there should be no one denying that...that invade is 90% to blame for everything that followed .. yes Saddam was evil, but he was a scary force located in a place that forced people to behave..his death f----- the region i mean come on
Nov 18, 2015 I agree BUT, iraq could've have been the strong hold for innocents to go to during this time if we made the right moves. A strong iraq with no dictator and arguably no isis. Idk if isis would be around or not just thrwoing that out there.
Nov 18, 2015 no, if Saddam was still around no one would dare to do what they are doing now...there would be no isis..Saddam was a scarier version of Russia..he would gladly k--- anyone who stepped out of line there would be no need for innocents to find a safe place
Nov 18, 2015 what im saying is: there is no saddam in my situation. rewind to 2011. if the us doesnt leave iraq and we wait till there is full stability and a military that is fully prepared to defend itself we would have and iraq that is democratic (not saying that democracy is the only reason why it would be good) and on the side of the good people. no saddam so no dictator which is good for everyone.
