Jun 4, 2016 Follow-up question for @WPG: I know these sound like I'm just making up outlandish examples but I'm just trying to cover all the bases: say I'm 100% sober and there is a girl who is drunk who wants to have sex, and I didn't have anything to do with her getting drunk she got drunk of her own volition and now wants to have sex, is it r--- on my part? Is that still considered taking advantage, even if I had nothing to do with her inebreation?
Jun 4, 2016 You know what I think about you: Putting aside the meme, you've always been, in my head, one of the most intelligent and thoughtful posters of the board, but you've been slipping lately with more complex debates and that saddens me The comparison doesn't make sense, your reading comprehension is poor and you're not bringing any relevant point You resort to Hopsin tier analogies like "if a man is drunk and decides to drive would that be DUI" even though that's the literal definition and you're attempting to equate it with the sexual, moral and health integrity of not 1 but 2 individuals And here's the problem: You think it's "not that important" because you talk about sex like it was just bust a nut and go home If the man is sober and the woman is drunk it's r---: No matter if she explicitly said yes That's like pushing a paralytic from a wheelchair because he said he'll have no problem standing up and then putting the blame on him Not the f---ing point dude
Jun 4, 2016 Our society does foster rapists, just like it fosters everything thing else in our society. That does not prove r--- culture. Try again.
Jun 4, 2016 Pato quit trying to come at me sideways just because you actually knew (for a brief moment) what you were talking about for once.
Jun 4, 2016 I've been too busy at the trap. Sorry though, sir. I thought you'd apologize for hurting my feelings the other month. But, when you were in college, you never had sex with a woman after you guys were drinking at a party? This girl was obviously a gold digger. A famous person doesn't need to 'r---' someone to receive sex. If he spiked her drink then it's different.
Jun 4, 2016 You made a comparison between DUI and the act of a sober man and a drunk woman having sex in the middle of a random party I said it's dumb You then resort to "if a guy is lit and there's a girl who's lit and we both wanna f--- does that make you a r--ist" even though we don't know what the f--- you mean with "lit" The debate started because you said that if a sober dude and a drunk woman who willingly said yes had sex that wouldn't make it r---: I'm expanding my point and making a comparison (the wheelchair scenario) What part of my comment you don't understand?
Jun 4, 2016 @Pato v2 you little s--- I said in my very next post that I wasn't talking about a man feeding a woman drinks I was talking about when they're both drunk don't talk to me about reading comprehension it took you a year and a half to understand the concept of present and past tenses.
Jun 4, 2016 I'm ignorant because I've asked you to expand on a controversial argument you made, and you've refused? I'm liking you less and less by the minute. I agree with all the scenarios you posted above, but I also think pretending @Trippy Skippy is somehow crazy for thinking verbal consent after self-intoxication isn't r---, is eye-rollingly frustrating. I mean, I disagree with him to an extent, but he's right to distinguish between morally wrong, and r---. You can't seem to make that jump.
Jun 4, 2016 No, I didn't. I'm saying you're dumb. No, you're the only one here who doesn't know what lit means, because you got your tenuous grasp of English from logic music videos. Your wheelchair scenario is f---ing stupid but I've already conceded that my initial fault with your post was my L. The part where you're tryna come at me like an armchair psychologist "you think it's just busting a nut" f--- off and don't quote me again Shitposter.
Jun 4, 2016 Why is it r--- when a female is to drunk but not when a male is? I was black out drunk before and had sex with a girl that was a 100% sober. So it's fine for her to do it but if the table was turned I'm a pile of s---?
Jun 4, 2016 How the f--- do you manage to contradict yourself so many times? First comment: 5 minutes later: Then: Then you made another question asking WPG if the scenario I was talking about (where you said I was spreading misleading information) was r--- or not: Take a deep breath
Jun 4, 2016 @Pato v2 I know what lit is and I don't even know if this sentence is grammatically correct
Jun 4, 2016 Dude @Pato v2 you're so slow all of those posts you quoted where I was admittedly wrong were from before I made the DUI analogy, by then I'd followed along enough to see where my initial post was wrong. From there I was trying to see how if both people are f----- up how that's considered r---, which is the point of the comparison. Seriously, quit trying to have a big ether moment its cringe.
Jun 4, 2016 I said "I don't know what the f--- you mean with lit" in this situation There are literally two definitions: 1. Being turned up 2. Being intoxicated
Jun 4, 2016 That there's a pervasive r--- culture in America is only "controversial" among a small, sheltered percentage of American males.
