Aug 25, 2017 Implying I've kissed only one. I can't believe I'm doing this with you. How old are you?
Aug 25, 2017 I'm 31 - how old are you? (And when will you grow out of Holocaust denial lol.) How many girls have you smooched? Was it you lurching onto someone, who quickly pulled away, shocked... or was it consensual/romantic? I am all ears on this.
Aug 25, 2017 look, i can't believe i've spent this much time on a racist sack of s--- who's never been on a date, but here: we're talking about your character traits now because there's no other way to explain such an ahistorical, obviously ludicrous world view. normal people don't arrive where you have. you feel isolated and unwanted so you're trying to cast yourself as a member of an aggrieved group who's under siege from, like, jews, i guess? it's pathetic, and you need counseling. any person off the street--working class, high school student, academic, mainstream republican, mainstream democrat--would read things you've written and go "jesus christ, this guy should be institutionalized."
Aug 25, 2017 This is just more character assassination. See, this is a very typical Jewish tactic, pathologizing outside thinkers, ESPECIALLY whites pursuing their own ethnic interests just as any other ethnic group.
Aug 25, 2017 “An ‘anti-semite’ in actual usage is less often a man who hates Jews than a man certain Jews hate. The word expresses the emotional explosion that occurs in people who simple can’t bear critical discourse about a sacred topic, and who experience criticism as profanation and blasphemy. The term ‘anti-semitism’ doesn’t stand for any intelligible concept. It belongs not to the world of rational discourse, but to the realm of imprecations and maledictions and ritual ostracisms.”
Aug 25, 2017 It isn't though! I am trying to help you. Paul put it well: "we're talking about your character traits now because there's no other way to explain such an ahistorical, obviously ludicrous world view. normal people don't arrive where you have. you feel isolated and unwanted" So I'm not here to judge - tell me more about these girls. How did this turn out BTW? Is she alive? https://forum.sectioneighty.com/i-call-upon-m-solo-and-any-other-experts.t28995/page-10#post-1992659
Aug 25, 2017 lol wow, you really are desperate. I've already debunked this in the first few pages of the thread.
Aug 25, 2017 I've asked several people the following question but never received a reply: Have you ever read a book on the Holocaust?
Aug 25, 2017 yes, of course. I studied history in college. What did you study? How old are you? Is the girl you kissed still alive? Debunked what? And, uh, no you haven't. No one believes you - on anything.
Aug 25, 2017 "...they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent" is a great summary of your behavior for the past week. You literaly have no self-awareness. Did you read the entire book and check its references, or just soak up a handful of unsourced claims and ludicrous stories about Jews being turned into lampshades? The claim that I was the OP.
Aug 25, 2017 Some of the best revisionist work out there relying on first rather than secondhand sources, which conformist historians still cling to. And on the newspeak term "holocaust denial": This is the delirious confusion inherent in the Newspeak linguistics which George Orwell warned against in 1984. It is this confusion that is exploited to maximum effect by the Exterminationist propagandists. They want people to believe that revisionists are saying that there were never any concentration camps, no crematoria, no deportations, no innocents killed. A common Jewish response when revisionists come to town is, “If they are right, what happened to my family? I lost my entire family to the war. It’s ridiculous to say there was no Holocaust.” This Jewish reasoning is solely dependent on the confusion fomented by the imposition of the amorphous “Holocaust” term on the public. If the Khazars define “Holocaust” to mean the death of family members in areas of German control, they are only alluding to the sad tragedies that occur in every modern war. There is nothing exceptional about it. No one is denying it. No revisionist from Butz to Berg to Faurisson to Martin has ever asserted otherwise. But, if “Holocaust” means that the Jewish man’s entire family was killed in a gas chamber, that is doubted by the revisionists. The issue of homicidal gas chambers, the number of Jewish casualties and the existence or non-existence of a deliberate Nazi policy of extermination – that is what revisionists debate, not the fact of Jewish suffering; not the fact that many of these people died. But note the dishonesty of the media in using the “Holocaust” generalization to mix apples and oranges in claiming that to doubt homicidal gas chambers and the six million figure is to doubt the fact that Jewish people perished in concentration camps at all. Michael Hoffman, The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic (2010)
Aug 25, 2017 This is why I called you an "intellectual mediocrity", a rather generous estimation on reflection.
