Politics If Joe Biden had run for President, would you have voted for him?

Started by WPG, Oct 22, 2016, in Life Add to Reading List

Biden

  1. Yes

    91.3%
  2. No

    8.7%
  1. WPG
    Posts: 11,861
    Likes: 22,506
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    WPG sxn80 Rory Gilmore

    Oct 22, 2016
    you can't vote if you think global warming is a hoax
     
    #1
    5
    SUPERHNDRXX, Goku187, Loyalty and 2 others like this.
    5
    SUPERHNDRXX, Goku187, Loyalty and 2 others like this.
    May 2, 2025
  2. Mraczewsky
    Posts: 4,772
    Likes: 10,904
    Joined: Feb 12, 2016

    Mraczewsky r.i.p. mac

    Oct 22, 2016
    read title as Joe Budden accidentally


    out
     
    #2
    6
    Ricky, ozy, Dread or Alive and 3 others like this.
    6
    Ricky, ozy, Dread or Alive and 3 others like this.
    May 2, 2025
  3. reD10S
    Posts: 2,160
    Likes: 3,531
    Joined: Jul 25, 2015

    reD10S The real is back

    Oct 22, 2016
    Yes, he seems to have principles unlike Hilary and actually is knowledgeable unlike Trump
     
    #3
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  4. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,807
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Oct 22, 2016
    I'm not sure what separates them ideologically. Not sure they'd be running on very different platforms. I'd be voting for whoever won the democratic primaries.
     
    #4
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  5. Skippy
    Posts: 4,615
    Likes: 10,831
    Joined: Mar 26, 2016
    Location: tx

    Skippy vr

    Oct 22, 2016
    Idk anything about his policies :dno:
     
    #5
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  6. Inland Empire Rapper
    Posts: 4,528
    Likes: 5,395
    Joined: Jan 9, 2016

    Inland Empire Rapper My Life, Your Entertainment

    Oct 22, 2016
    He didn't have anything to offer that would rival Obama; I don't know if he would of ever had a platform to gain a democratic nomination. I might be interested but Bernie Sanders came out with a great platform and was a great debater with some controversial ideas that Hilary watered down.

    I don't know if I want to get into another Hillary v. Trump thing but the scary thing is that and hate me for it but Trump actually won the 3rd debate based on sheer presence alone.

    I really f---ing hate Hilary's smile and the times she smiled at, if it were Bernie up there then I would f---ing vote for Bernie but I'm probably going to vote Hilary just so I can seem cool because America is going to f---ing vote for Trump since he is overcoming the sexual allegations that should of destroyed his presidential career.
     
    #6
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  7. tomroe93
    Posts: 6,037
    Likes: 6,529
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Oct 22, 2016
    Without a doubt
     
    #7
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  8. Fitzy
    Posts: 4,797
    Likes: 7,390
    Joined: Sep 8, 2015

    Fitzy BeliGOAT

    Oct 23, 2016
    In 2008 I would've definitely voted for Joe Budden tho.
     
    #8
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  9. 83837477
    Posts: 23,084
    Likes: 48,321
    Joined: May 14, 2016

    83837477 Test Account

    Oct 23, 2016
    It is a hoax holy f--- you're actually r-----ed
     
    #9
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  10. eddie313
    Posts: 12,477
    Likes: 10,199
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    eddie313 The Funeral

    Oct 23, 2016
    [​IMG]
     
    #10
    1
    JFK likes this.
    1
    JFK likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  11. Eazy
    Posts: 608
    Likes: 485
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Eazy gotta have that crunch

    Oct 24, 2016
    I'd prefer Biden over any candidate in this election
     
    #11
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  12. Dislikeboy
    Posts: 535
    Likes: 198
    Joined: Jan 7, 2015

    Oct 28, 2016
    Dr. Reid A. Bryson, universally recognized as the father of modern climatology, confirms...

    No one disputes Dr. Reid A. Bryson is a real scientist, not even the climate change hucksters.

    [...]

    Bryson is a real climate scientist, the father of the whole discipline, and he doesn’t believe the climate change scam at all. He’s not alone among real scientists. There are actually thirty-one thousand who have signed the following petition to formally register their dissent to this politically motivated hoax:

    We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

    There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

    Vostok ice-core samples. Look it up. Or read Ch. 9 of Government Zero (link below). Or stay a cowardly, ignorant, shallow, weak-brained pathetic little douche of a man for the remainder of your life. Your call.

    scribd.com/document/290776059/Bez-Vlasta
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2016
    #12
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  13. Dislikeboy
    Posts: 535
    Likes: 198
    Joined: Jan 7, 2015

    Oct 28, 2016
    The earth’s oceans have been steadily rising since the end of the last ice age. In the beginning the rise was very quick. There was several hundred feet of sea level rise in just a few hundred years, but over the last many thousands of years, the rise has only been about three millimeters per year. For the last 120 years, British and U.S. naval observatories have been measuring sea levels around the world very carefully, and the sea level rise has been quite consistent. Satellite measurements prove that there is still the ever reliable three millimeters per year. It’s irrefutable. Only the climate hoaxers, the green mafia, still push the lies about computer models that predicted the rise will soon be 6-9 millimeters per year. They keep predicting it in order to sell more of their products and to rob more of the public treasuries around the world. Climate hysterics are selling you a bill of goods, and they are doing this for only one reason: because of the big money in green rackets. The green rackets have made more millionaires than you can imagine—billionaires, in fact—building solar plants in the deserts of Nevada that produce very, very little electricity proportionate to the amount of money that they have raked out of the public.
     
    #13
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  14. Ricky
    Posts: 41,200
    Likes: 106,754
    Joined: Jul 15, 2015

    Ricky FORUM PRIME WILL BE BACK

    Oct 28, 2016
     
    #14
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  15. Fazers
    Posts: 4,924
    Likes: 7,036
    Joined: Nov 27, 2014

    Oct 28, 2016
    would def take biden over hillary, but dude had more than enough personal reasons to not put himself through that. hopefully he has some time to relax after the new year
     
    #15
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  16. WPG
    Posts: 11,861
    Likes: 22,506
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    WPG sxn80 Rory Gilmore

    Oct 28, 2016
    he's gonna be Secretary of State imo
     
    #16
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  17. Fazers
    Posts: 4,924
    Likes: 7,036
    Joined: Nov 27, 2014

    Oct 28, 2016
    yeah, was just reading an article on that last night after i wrote the post. would be a good pick.
     
    #17
    0 0
    May 2, 2025