Jan 12, 2022 One more thing: If you scan the barcode of the album cover in a barcode scanner app, it returns the right result/number - is is objectively a real UPC code, and reveals that the UPC has not been cataloged by anyone yet. While this already disproves his copy and paste theory, if you go scan his fake from his Discord that he says was copied it is an actual fake barcode from an entirely different product
Jan 12, 2022 I stand corrected, that makes sense as well. The coincidence is that the example barcode first digits are very similar to eminem catalog numbers: MTBMB: 602508735165 Kamikaze: 602577052357 Revival: 60256146445
Jan 12, 2022 1. Wrong. The one on my Discord is a barcode from Google Images. The numbers are not trying to copy anything Eminem related. 2. Why is the number 80% the same? What are the odds of that lol? 3. Nice cope, but...every single Eminem CD back art has been a full rectangle with sides don't know what the f--- type of s--- you're on about. This point goes to me. 4. Definitely not, why would Twitter "post process" a small 1000 x 1000 JPG so much that literal elements of the image move, that's some bs. You have no idea what you're talking about the fact that you call it post processing, Twitter compresses images true, but compression in this magnitude would not be enough to shift elements and completely change details. This point also goes to me. 5. You completely ignore the fact that the FBI logo is way out of scale and incorrect when compared to any album, ever. This point goes to me. As for your last comment, so then go and test it mf, don't come at my points claiming it's wrong because Twitter does post processing, GO and prove that then post it here and I'll admit I'm wrong.
Jan 12, 2022 I wrote about it a couple of pages ago, but I'll repeat. If you check what else this manufacturer sells, it's Mario plushy, necklaces and some other random s---. If you take literally any album, manufacturer always sells CD's/DVD's/Vinyls
Jan 12, 2022 if it was from a different product, wouldn't it be cataloged? I might be misunderstanding tho
Jan 12, 2022 What's the point of doing this much of a deep dive into some stupid s--- that's probably gonna be debunked a few days from now anyways?
Jan 12, 2022 I don't think this is how cataloging works for music. Go look up the actual previous eminem releases and see what you see for the first six digits: 602508 602577 602561
Jan 12, 2022 Amongst all, do yall remember when Revival tracklist surfaced with those many feats and everybody didn't believe ePro, but then that tracklist turned out to be real?
Jan 12, 2022 The barcode is real. Why would he copy your random fake barcode and not an actual Eminem album if he were going to fake it?
Jan 12, 2022 Already checked. First is MTBMB, second is Side B, third is Kanye's MBDTF (just to show that it applies to every artist)
Jan 12, 2022 Same thing happened with the Recovery tracklist. A lot of people thought it was an April Fools joke.
Jan 12, 2022 Why the f--- are we even arguing this The random product barcode from my Discord is 7 25272 73070 6 The barcode from the "leak" is 6 02522 73070 2 The first barcode is associated with some random manufacturer that has nothing to do with music, and as a whole, the new "leaked" UPC code does not show up as valid when you search it up. Why is it that this leak, somehow "coincidently" has the exact same product number that was posted in an Eminem discord that makes artwork. There's just no shot, I'm not saying it's impossible to have the same number but the probability of that is like 1 in 100,000
Jan 12, 2022 lol it's hard for me to enjoy Em's collabs these days. It sucks. Back in the days I would be excited for every new Em verse or hook. Now I barely give a s--- about the new collab and it's almost out.
