Dec 12, 2016 Are you serious with this? You understand how off the mark and frivolous you sound right?
Dec 12, 2016 FTR: if Russia indeed meddled in this election - by hacking the RNC and DNC, then choosing to only release emails that hurt HRC - it throws the entire election results into doubt. Both because of the obvious danger this represents (we're a country hinged on free elections you f---ing dipshits), but also... who is to say what else may have occurred? Remember when conservatives pretended to care about voter fraud? take your L @Perry The Platypus ..sap
Dec 12, 2016 perry is impressively dumb when you consider how much he purports to care about this stuff
Dec 12, 2016 Not only is that.. Not true (you don't even live here?) but you totally side stepped my actual point
Dec 12, 2016 She was. Trump got negative coverage, but it was because he was CONSTANTLY saying something contradictory/inflammatory/utterly insane. Name a single moment where he faced an absolute shitstorm of coverage over *literally* nothing, like HRC did with the Comey letter Seriously, compare the relentlessly negative treatment of HRC in the media when new Anthony Weiner emails were discovered (?????????) to coverage of the President-elect paying tens of millions of dollars to settle a fraud lawsuit (one day story, overshadowed because the cast of Hamilton was 'mean'). The difference is night and day, and it's indicative of how we got here
Dec 13, 2016 It greatly amuses me to see my doubters being absolutely destroyed by a platypus. Common sense will prevail and we will make America great again! Thank you and God bless!
Dec 13, 2016 [ Come on. Look I'm the farthest thing away from a politically correct SJW in fact i despise those types but that wasn't a "joke". That was a 60 year old man bragging about sexually assaulting women.
Dec 13, 2016 :S you're the simple type who only reads the headlines, aren't you? While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named. "ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow." This....proves literally nothing. With reading comprehension skills like this, it's no wonder you're a Trump supporter tbh
Dec 13, 2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html?_r=0 ugggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh @Perry The Platypus
Dec 14, 2016 Wow the logic contortions "Ofc the Russians are hacking us that's Why That c---- Hillary Needs to be Hate f----- To Death" "lmao, even if the Russians were actively undermining our electoral process, Trump won fair and square"
Dec 14, 2016 lol please - you support a brand of politics behind Pizzagate. You can't even defend a majority of your stances. And no, I'm repeating what the CIA and President Obama are saying lol. John McCain knows what's up.
