Sign Up / Log In

reply to thread

Thread Tools

SS3 vs 56 Nights

Started by Narsh, May 16, 2016, in Music Add to Reading List

bettee project

  1. ss3

    8 vote(s)
    21.1%

  2. 56 nights

    30 vote(s)
    78.9%
  1. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    In what world
     
    #21
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  2. hoesagain
    Posts: 789
    Likes: 1,251
    Joined: Jul 23, 2015

    hoesagain

    May 16, 2016
    I'm gonna go with ss3 just because it's new to me right now and 56 nights I've replayed into the ground, still a classic Future tape
     
    #22
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  3. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    If anything ss3 has a higher number of standouts but 56 plays flawlessly front to back
     
    #23
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  4. WPG
    Posts: 11,861
    Likes: 22,506
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    WPG sxn80 Rory Gilmore

    May 16, 2016
     
    #24
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  5. Mike Tyson
    Posts: 20,023
    Likes: 63,071
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Mike Tyson big cuntry's alias

    May 16, 2016
    no bro, when will you learn that standouts don't make a project great. ss3 has standouts, but as a project it's forgettable for me.

    56 nights easily for me, but yeah, even though i talk sideways about ss3 on here, you know how much i genuinely enjoy it via my snaps.
     
    #25
    4
    Ordinary Joel, boyz n the suburbs, DKC and 1 other person like this.
    4
    Ordinary Joel, boyz n the suburbs, DKC and 1 other person like this.
    May 2, 2025
  6. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Can someone explain why 56 nights tho pls
     
    #26
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  7. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    f--- do u mean "when will I learn" lmao this isn't a recurring issue w me or something and I literally JUST talked about 56 nights being the better front to back listen above u fuckboy smh
     
    #27
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  8. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    I just don't think that's enough in this scenario for 56 nights to edge out the project w digits/slime s---/drippin

    I'm not actually mad at anyone for choosing 56 nights
     
    #28
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  9. Mike Tyson
    Posts: 20,023
    Likes: 63,071
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Mike Tyson big cuntry's alias

    May 16, 2016
    my b

    i guess i was jus going at n----s for saying "x song > y album" yesterday. i'm jus sick of that argument and that frustration prob carried over
     
    #29
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  10. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Yeah I deff don't think like that. But in my pov ss3 more than makes up for not being as cohesive of a listen as 56 nights w moments like with them or worth it or drippin. I could name a different song every time lol because I think ss3 is more consistent than 56 nights

    And they're both so short that it's not like ss3 not being AS cohesive is THAT big of an issue
     
    #30
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  11. Packman
    Posts: 6,972
    Likes: 10,735
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    Packman

    May 16, 2016
    The dismissing of SS3 on this site is nauseating
     
    #31
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  12. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Apparently ss3 is a top thug project according to @Swizz but now beast mode and 56 nights are both better :thinkingemoji:
     
    #32
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    1
    Mike Tyson likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  13. Packman
    Posts: 6,972
    Likes: 10,735
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    Packman

    May 16, 2016
    Well, logically... That can make sense

    :wtf2wtf:
     
    #33
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  14. Mike Tyson
    Posts: 20,023
    Likes: 63,071
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Mike Tyson big cuntry's alias

    May 16, 2016
    i think that means future is better :thinkingemoji:
     
    #34
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  15. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Yea but it hurts my soul
     
    #35
    1
    Packman likes this.
    1
    Packman likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  16. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Yeah but he's clearly not
     
    #36
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  17. Packman
    Posts: 6,972
    Likes: 10,735
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    Packman

    May 16, 2016
    F&L reference!!?
     
    #37
    1
    Ordinary Joel likes this.
    1
    Ordinary Joel likes this.
    May 2, 2025
  18. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    I'll take the range provided by ss3 over 56 nights "cohesiveness"

    I'll take the level of rapping on drippin or with them over the 56 nights "cohesiveness"
     
    #38
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  19. Packman
    Posts: 6,972
    Likes: 10,735
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    Packman

    May 16, 2016
    Why clearly lol?
     
    #39
    0 0
    May 2, 2025
  20. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Narsh

    May 16, 2016
    Smh
     
    #40
    0 0
    May 2, 2025