Nov 18, 2015 how am i misinformed when im agreeing with that ur saying just adding an alternative scenario to it?
Nov 18, 2015 HOW AM I BEING BLINDED? Why would we want it to go to s---? give me a reason as to why the united states would want iraq to be in upheaval ?
Nov 18, 2015 Correct me if I'm wrong but the root of your scenario is saying we were right to get rid of Sadaam. I've talked to a lot of people who have lived or know people to have lived in Iraq and the consensus is that they did not want to see him assassinated. So we could be in control.
Nov 18, 2015 You basically admitted you don't want to believe facts becaus you're scared to admit Americans would have died in vain Welcome to reality brossein
Nov 18, 2015 I agree. Women everywhere should also stop giving birth. Sure, 99.9% of babies will grow up to be fine, but one might s---t up a school.
Nov 18, 2015 to answer your first part, yes and no. it was good that we got rid of a bad dictator but bad that we killed innocent people in the wake of it and caused what is happening today. but like a said a free iraq would be better if they had a strong defense against things like isis, which they clearly dont. and how would we be in control if we completely leave in 2011?
Nov 18, 2015 lol again it's not Muslims it's the Syrian part and it's the 18-30 year old fit males and the fact isis operates heavily in the region (obviously) They better not add these refugees right away. Rigorous screening process is mandatory.
Nov 18, 2015 You're right, it's bad that we killed innocent people, but even worse is bailing on a situation prematurely when we were the main cause behind it. Look at the area now. Guess who's providing heavy air assistance? Guess who they would love to have a presence on the ground to help combat ISIS? Spoiler
Nov 18, 2015 Air support to its fullest effect by tthe us, russia and other nato countries will tremendously help the situation for people fighting agains isis.
Nov 18, 2015 "It was not until January 1944 that President Franklin D. Roosevelt, under pressure from officials in his own government and an American Jewish community then fully aware of the extent of mass murder, took action to rescue European Jews. " http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007094
Nov 18, 2015 Stop with the American nuthugging. They were a part of the destabilization of the Middle East. If the U.S had their way, they'd have Assad gone and a new guy with America's hand straight up his a---.
Nov 18, 2015 Its the same situation we are in now. I dont think this lead will the capacity of the Holocaust but better to end the threat sooner than later.
Nov 18, 2015 another huge part of this that no one is talking about (i only read page 1 so far) is that injecting this many refugees into any country, ESPECIALLY france THIS soon after the attacks is going to stir up a LOT of emotions. Innocent or not the public is going to be apprehensive of the refugees and isolate and alienate them. It'd be nice to think everyone will accept the refugees and we will all hold hands and smiles and sing and form a giant peace symbol that is visible from space but life isn't a carebares cartoon. They're going to be shunned and discriminated against, whether or not they should be is a moot point. That kind of alienation seems to be what isis prays on. They don't need to send radicalized terrorists into these countries, just by creating a hostile environment they have to flee and getting them into these countries while simultaneously attacking the countries puts a huge hate fuled target wrongfully on the backs of the refugees is creating sleeper agents. Even if not a single isis member infiltrates, there's going to be thousands of people who are experiencing their anti west narrative first hand.
Nov 18, 2015 Your assumption is false. Bad intentioned people are always around.. even in your midsts. The only real question you're trying to ask is whether Americans should remain racist. I think we should start to obsolve it.
Nov 18, 2015 f--- the word racist. If it's in your nations best interest, do what you must. A government is best suited looking after its own people, not ones in other countries. If the U.S wants to bring in refugees effectively, you keep them away from main cities. I don't think it's fair to put them in small towns, the locals would be taking on a big responsibility - but midsized cities, are the best places to put them. Also, don't put them in the f---ing ghetto. That's instant conflict. Has to be a Middle Class area, IMO.
