Apr 10, 2016 At this point a vast majority of the members are a bunch of sad clowns so we can't even support that
Apr 10, 2016 I genuinely think that the whole of BLM is completely incapable of becoming an actual, peaceful movement. They can't even organize a proper protest, they always just want to stand in the middle of freeways and piss people off who need to get to work. Even the mild members are not worth supporting.
Apr 10, 2016 it does s--- that its not as organized as previous civil rights before it, but maybe that's just a reflection of society, who knows i support the message of the movement which really only matters to me, as the kid in the video spouting off s--- about white genocide is dumb but it doesn't really affect me on any personal level, like im not fearing for my life in anyway
Apr 10, 2016 So in the same thread youre denouncing trigger wanting clutter you're equating inflammatory tweets to a hate group that has a history of lynching Lmao
Apr 10, 2016 Btw videos of these clowns getting plowed by cars that aren't taking their s--- make for great entertainment You don't seem very capable of differentiating between literal hate-speech and differing opinions. "Trigger warnings" on university, 9 times out of 10, are applied to outright ridiculous things such as "disagreement with feminism". There's a difference between intolerance of difference in opinion (which "trigger warnings" are almost always in regards to) and intolerance of literal hate-speech/advocacy of genocide. Again, I suppose you'd support me standing in Beverly Hills with a sign that says "k--- these worthless n-----s", and you wouldn't take any issue with it? If not, you're a hypocrite. Only difference would be that I wouldn't be sanctioned/protected and given a platform to do so by a university. I've stated this twice, keep up.
Apr 10, 2016 Yes, and I've already explained my reasoning behind this about 3 times. Are you only capable of reading what you want to see?
Apr 10, 2016 So I've come to a new conclusion. King's is actually half black because his mom was black and his mom used to beat the s--- out of him so that's why he hates women and black people.
Apr 10, 2016 from the comments (sorry if it was already posted) "For what it is worth, I sent an email to the president of the University of West Georgia, the school where the two black debaters were studying. His response, in my opinion, is worth sharing so you get the entire context. Dear Mr. Davis, I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to email me directly concerning the posting of this video clip. We understand the concern surrounding a video posted this week that includes comments made by two former University of West Georgia debate students. While these students participated in a nationally sanctioned debate event in 2012 representing UWG, their comments, or the comments made in any debate, do not reflect the University’s views or values. We take diversity and inclusion very seriously. We work hard every day to ensure our students, faculty and staff from all backgrounds feel welcome and valued. Our top priority remains fostering the safest learning environment we can in which students can learn, grow and achieve. As part of that commitment, UWG will not tolerate or allow comments or behavior that incite prejudice or violence against any individual or group. Any student who engages in such behavior will be investigated under the university’s student code of conduct, resulting in appropriate sanctions. Comments made during debate training or debate events or theater rehearsals are rare exceptions to this policy. College debate programs operate in a manner similar to laboratories, where events like those depicted in the video are closely controlled and monitored. One team presents a position and the other responds, often using extreme arguments to show that a particular point is illogical. In the case of the 2012 video, the debate centered on energy policy. The first team argued that white people embracing the location of wind turbines in their neighborhoods would be a way to address criticism that racism is inherent in the movement of white populations from urban areas. The former UWG students countered that argument by claiming that the extreme would not be for white people to locate themselves near wind turbines, but rather for white people to sacrifice themselves to remove racism altogether. The purpose of the statement was to show the absurdity of their opponents’ position. Unfortunately, the purposefully-edited video posted this week does not capture the complete discussion. It includes less than a minute and a half of a debate that lasted more than an hour and a half. It does not show that the first team injected the element of racism. Ultimately, it focuses solely on the extreme points used by one of the UWG students to counter an argument in a sanctioned debate. When taken out of the context of a competition in which one team commonly uses extreme rhetoric to argue against an opponent’s extreme rhetoric, the scenes from the video are shocking. The fact that the debate was not halted and authorities were not notified shows the controlled environment in which the comments were made. Again, the students’ comments included in the video do not reflect the values of our university. They do not represent beliefs or doctrines we teach to students. I sincerely hope that by providing the context in which this video is depicted helps restore your faith in our university and in future generations of leaders. Sincerely, Kyle Marrero"
Apr 10, 2016 So how many times must you morons be told to provide a single instance of me "hating women"? Convenient how every single one of you avoids doing this. Since you support feminism, you hate men and white people. I apparently do not need any reason other than my own feelings to claim this (by your standards), so you hate men and white people.
Apr 10, 2016 To begin, I don't think you hate women, I just think you're horribly misinformed about feminism, and that can be easily interpreted to you hating women. Let's see, in this thread you decided to cite a Men's Rights blog as a legit source for your dumbass opinions on feminism and the wage gap, which you promptly got called out for: Or let's just look at this great gem from the same thread: Now, before you think I'm going to totally disagree with you, I will say, you have some points. Can you be racist to white people? Yes, but how much effect does that racism have? Not much. And can you be sexist to men? Yes, and there is some legit effects it does to hurt men, but for discrimination against women is way worse. There are problems that should be fixed in both sides but women have way more. The point of feminism is that it's a team effort between men and women of all races and creeds to work together to be truly equal in society. Of course, vocal minorities in the community of feminism go against this, but they're called vocal minorities for a reason, they don't represent a whole movement. Then there's this thread right here, don't feel like linking examples as it's more or less a repeat of the last thread. Basically, you seem to have a huge hate boner for feminism and you need to stop overdosing on Viagra and chill the f--- out.
Apr 10, 2016 Didn't read OP but must be tiring finding new ways to convince yourself that your self-loathing is the fault of women and black people on a daily basis
Apr 10, 2016 Those are individuals who have radicalized the movement, not groups of BLM supporters. Like, KKK would bring hundreds of their members to black families or black individuals and commit violent murders in GROUPS, not by one individual. Know the difference. BLM, as non-peaceful as they can be, are nowhere near KKK level. Unless those murders were a plan by all members of BLM, then they were not from the BLM.
