There Will Be Blood vs. No Country For Old Men [Poll]

Started by Charlie Work, Apr 26, 2015, in Entertainment Add to Reading List

Which do you prefer?

  1. There Will Be Blood

    13 vote(s)
    54.2%
  2. No Country For Old Men

    11 vote(s)
    45.8%
  1. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,807
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Apr 27, 2015
    Lumet's book on making films is a really easy and insightful read for anybody interested.
     
    #41
    1
    Pinhead likes this.
    1
    Pinhead likes this.
    May 10, 2025
  2. ComfortablyNumb
    Posts: 1,663
    Likes: 2,187
    Joined: Feb 19, 2011
    Location: Cleveland

    Apr 28, 2015
    NCFOM. Anton Chigurh is such a GOAT villain. Every scene he's in is memorable. And I might be a little biased towards the Coen Brothers. I love everything they do. I do need to sit down and watch TWBB again though. I haven't seen it in a long time and I think on my last watch I still didn't fully get it. I've watched bits and pieces since then though and loved what I saw.
     
    #42
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  3. Rob B
    Posts: 360
    Likes: 249
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 28, 2015
    Ultimatum is a masterpiece. I actually think it's better than TWBB...

    Sidney Lumet is great. Leave it to him to get someone like Vin Diesel to deliver such a charming performance in Find Me Guilty(although I've always thought Diesel to be a bit underrated as an actor anyway).
     
    #43
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  4. Pinhead
    Posts: 2,577
    Likes: 2,363
    Joined: Nov 24, 2014
    Location: Whitecourt

    Apr 28, 2015
    :kanye:

    You lost me m8
     
    #44
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  5. Rob B
    Posts: 360
    Likes: 249
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 28, 2015
    I kind of figured as much. Bruh, if you're looking for someone who thinks everything PTA does is amazing, I'm not the guy. There is not one movie he's done that I've loved. I appreciate TWBB more than I like watching it. Ultimatum though... there isn't one action spy film before or after that is as masterfully crafted.
     
    #45
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  6. Pinhead
    Posts: 2,577
    Likes: 2,363
    Joined: Nov 24, 2014
    Location: Whitecourt

    Apr 28, 2015
    My problem, if you can call it that, isn't that you don't like PTA or There Will Be Blood, I'm just baffled as to why you hold The Bourne Ultimatum in such high regard. As I mentioned, I've seen it within the last two weeks (the 15th to be exact) and although I had a great time with it, I can't say I remember much from it at all.
     
    #46
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  7. DKC
    Posts: 23,404
    Likes: 81,848
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    DKC shortygonletmecrush

    Apr 28, 2015
    Though both are fantastic films, I'm a huge fan of both Cormac McCarthy and media that explores existentialism (plus I like dark humor and the Coens in general), so I personally prefer No Country For Old Men. No Country is something I can watch any time, I gotta be in the right mood to sit down and take everything in for There Will Be Blood.

    Someone once pointed out to me that, if these two movies swapped titles, they'd probably be a more accurate descriptor of their content, which was surprisingly on point.
     
    #47
    2
    Meero and BrotherMan like this.
    2
    Meero and BrotherMan like this.
    May 10, 2025
  8. Rob B
    Posts: 360
    Likes: 249
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 28, 2015
    If you watched the movie and can't see what's special about it, then I'm not sure there's anything I can say to change your mind, but I'll give it a shot.

    I hold the original Bourne Trilogy in high regard for plenty of reasons. The most obvious one to me is the humanity of it. It's not a brutish trilogy. Its action is heightened, but always grounded because of the characters, which the actors play as realistically as possible. The tension is always high and palpable because the movies can play their cards without seeming over the top. Bourne is never portrayed as a super hero as he easily could have been. He's portrayed simply as a normal guy who just happened to be an assassin in a former life and Matt Damon was the perfect choice for the role. Damon naturally comes off as normal despite being a famous actor. And all of the characters that could have seemed like archetypes in different hands, are all portrayed as real people, rather than caricatures. The direction in all three films(Doug Liman and Paul Greengrass) is both frantic and personal, giving shaky cam solid reasons why its a credible filmmaking technique(though it's been copied terribly by others). The action by itself could have carried these films, but instead the filmmakers give it something that most other films and franchises of its kind never do. Authenticity.

    The Bourne Ultimatum though, takes everything about the previous two films, and perfects them. It's the pinnacle of what the genre it resides in can be.
     
    #48
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  9. Pinhead
    Posts: 2,577
    Likes: 2,363
    Joined: Nov 24, 2014
    Location: Whitecourt

    Apr 28, 2015
    I see where you're coming from, but I can't agree with much of this. Action wise, nothing in Ultimatum is as urgent or intense as anything in Supremacy, and I've found that all three of the main Bourne films each take turns at doing something great without those things being woven together into one film to create a complete film that is truly great in itself. Identity tells the best story, Supremacy has the best action, and Ultimatum has pieces of what I just mentioned with a polish that is sorely needed for modern day action films. All that brings me to my main overarching problem with the franchise - Jason Bourne himself. You mention how he seems like a normal guy, but aside from the last ten minutes or so of Supremacy, his character is completely soulless. I have no idea how somebody could connect themselves to him as there's no vulnerability, personality, or life to him at all. Apart from Matt Damon sort of looking like your average dude and keeping his gadget usage grounded (he's kind of the anti-James Bond) he's not really normal at all. He's not Superman, nor your average dude... he just kind of is what he is.

    But I couldn't name five Spy Action movies off the top of my head so maybe I'm just not the target demographic for these types of films. :manny:
     
    #49
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    1
    Narsh likes this.
    May 10, 2025
  10. Rob B
    Posts: 360
    Likes: 249
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 28, 2015
    Lol. d---. Our perspectives are on a completely different side of the spectrum. This discussion is gonna end up as an "immoveable object meets an unstoppable force" scenario. I'm just gonna refer to my original post. Agree to disagree bruh.
     
    #50
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  11. Vahn
    Posts: 3,381
    Likes: 4,781
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Vahn butterfly jewels beauty

    Apr 28, 2015
    4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days >>>>>>>
     
    #51
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  12. Meero
    Posts: 7,813
    Likes: 15,082
    Joined: Nov 23, 2014

    Meero Ay ay ay

    Apr 28, 2015
    Going to watch TWBB rn :allears:
     
    #52
    1
    Packman likes this.
    1
    Packman likes this.
    May 10, 2025
  13. lil uzi vert stan
    Posts: 7,755
    Likes: 19,759
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    y? jc

    --
    was just talking with a coworker who RLY hates pt anderson. made me rethink of the 'instant legend' status we've bestowed.

    --
    something about tarantino's voice still irks me. its not the usual stamp of an auteur rly -- all his films have a live action comic book flair that undercuts other (usually strong) aspects of the movie
     
    #53
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  14. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    cept pinhead made better points than ya :khaled2:
     
    #54
    1
    Pinhead likes this.
    1
    Pinhead likes this.
    May 10, 2025
  15. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    whats wrong with that?
     
    #55
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  16. lil uzi vert stan
    Posts: 7,755
    Likes: 19,759
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    nothing if ur marvel, but in the case of tarantino, my point is i still think hes got an immature voice. his command/knowledge is obviously without question -- but the dude is like Mozart in Amadeus
     
    #56
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  17. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    but has a more "mature" voice than the one he's been using been needed for any of his films yet? they've all benefited from his voice, if anything, in my opinion.

    his voice is what makes k--- bill 1 & 2 so exceptional
     
    #57
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  18. Rob B
    Posts: 360
    Likes: 249
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    You wouldn't know a good point if it smacked you in the head. :westbrook3:
     
    #58
    0 0
    May 10, 2025
  19. Narsh
    Posts: 40,221
    Likes: 46,514
    Joined: Jun 11, 2011

    Apr 30, 2015
    you think bourne ultimatum is better than twbb
     
    #59
    1
    Vahn likes this.
    1
    Vahn likes this.
    May 10, 2025
  20. Old_Parr
    Posts: 268
    Likes: 378
    Joined: Apr 9, 2011
    Location: Maracaibo, Venezuela

    Apr 30, 2015
    Bourne Ultimatum is one of my favorites from the last decade, but nowhere near the level of There Will Be Blood.

    I Agree to certain point with @captainawesome about Tarantino, however, that same style is what made Inglourious Basterds (my 3rd favorite film) and Pulp Fiction the amazing films they are, so i can't complain.
    As far as Tarantino Vs PTA, I consider PTA a better director, as a writter the match is tough
     
    #60
    0 0
    May 10, 2025