Jun 21, 2016 http://mobile.lemonde.fr/les-decode...s-sur-la-piste-du-djihad_4524774_4355770.html French article but at a moment it says "Parmi les Français en voie de radicalisation, et proches du djihadisme, un quart sont mineurs, 35 % sont des femmes et 40 % sont des convertis. " "within the French people in way of radicalisation, 25 % are underage, 35% are women and 40% are converted"
Jun 21, 2016 Of course, but that ideology is intensified because of islamophobia and the bombings of Muslim countries that wouldn't be bombed if the western wasn't islamophobic
Jun 21, 2016 What about the fact that they k--- other muslims or are the other muslims islamophobic too
Jun 21, 2016 The Soviet Union didn't take over countries against their will. It was mainly an inward inspired conversion rather than a subduement of their governments.
Jun 21, 2016 Because muslims not unlike Christians aren't one type of people. There's also factions and groups among them.
Jun 21, 2016 Uhhh, the reasons Western countries intervened in the Middle East is not simply because of Islamaphobia
Jun 21, 2016 Man just said the Soviet Union never took over countries against their will. Thank God the caddy got big back seats, gonna have to lay down for awhile, maybe listen to some Coltrane and have a glass of white wine
Jun 21, 2016 Okay i'll count Afghanistan. Poland was socialist before WWII and pretty much stayed so until outside pressure gave them the courage to step out of the USSR. That's one country, against how many?
Jun 21, 2016 Poland was invaded by the USSR, had a government already in exile in London, the USSR then despite promising free elections had rigged them and made the country a full communist satellite state. I legit studied this s--- trust me.
Jun 21, 2016 Soviet Union killed many people including its own. Doesn't mean it depended on expansion rather on defending their people's desired beliefs.
