Sep 5, 2015 f--- are you even on about? I see you're trying really hard to make some point but failing tremendously. I wanna try help you out here but you're being stubborn. I know it's not about me since I'm not the pregnant mother. You aren't the pregnant mother either And the pregnant mother herself isn't the only one in the picture either there's also the life inside of her. Do you understand you silly dickhead?
Sep 5, 2015 This would have been the case back in the 50's and 60's probably, not now though which is for the best.
Sep 5, 2015 Um in the 50's they were doing "shock therapy" to try and scare the gay out of people i think you're missing what im saying almost entirely
Sep 6, 2015 I mean, until 150 years ago people were literally hung for being gay. And everyone thought that was perfectly moral and alright. If you think about how morality changes over decades/centuries it's pretty clear that in 200 years time they'll look back on modern society's views on things and be like "wtf were they thinking". That's why I think it's important to question literally everything. Even things most people in society take to be fact or objectively (im)moral or right/wrong. There isn't a true objective morality. If any one of us had grown up in Saudi Arabia we'd be against gay marriage and abortion. If any one of us had grown up in Ancient Greece we wouldn't have thought there was anything wrong or abnormal about 60 year old men a----raping little boys. Everyone's moral compass is heavily influenced by the society they grew up in and the things they were taught (directly and indirectly) as kids. Thankfully now we know that people don't choose to be gay (and that God probably doesn't exist so f--- the Bible) and that raping little boys will f--- em up for life. It would be interesting to see how morality develops as science keeps progressing. Shame we'll all be dead soon.
Sep 6, 2015 Terrible third paragraph and you also missed my point completely. What I was saying was that it's entirely possible for medicine to advance to the point where we see some of these things (instances where like.... a prisoner needs the state to pay to have his penis chopped off) as being a fully curable disease.
Sep 6, 2015 Maybe the "I mean," put you off, but I have no idea how you can view my post as disagreeing with yours. Change "I mean," to "Yeah," and re-read it.
Sep 6, 2015 Essentially yes. Sexual orientation is developed at a very young age. Typically from 3-5 years old but some people may not be fully aware of their sexual orientation until they become teenagers.
Sep 6, 2015 There has been research of certain genes possibly leading to someone being born genetically gay, but none of that research has been proven conclusive.
Sep 6, 2015 I don't mean to change the topic from abortion to sexuality, but what's to say you're not developing a sexual orientation based off circumstances and not genetics?
Sep 6, 2015 Pro-abortion some MFers shouldn't reproduce, but also for people that aren't prepared and the kid shouldn't have to pay for that mistake.
Sep 6, 2015 That sounds about right to me. I have a cousin who's gay and pretty much everyone knew it by the age of 5. Obviously no one ever said anything to him, but he had the "gay lisp", only hung out with girls, used to nick his mum's makeup and clothes to try them on etc. His dad's hard as nails, pretty homophobic and did literally everything to try and "change" his son/prevent him from turning out gay. It caused a lot of hardship ON that side of the family so that's always made me pretty confident that being gay isn't choice. Of course that one example doesn't speak for everyone but I still find the idea of someone "choosing" to be gay pretty weird and unlikely.
Sep 6, 2015 Back on topic and for the record, I'm pro-abortion. But I also hate millitant pro-choice activists who believe we're not even allowed to have a discussion on it ("it takes place in a women's body, she can do whatever the f--- she wants!"). I don't think foetuses should be aborted after 26 weeks (or whatever stage they can survive on their own).
Sep 6, 2015 I think the biggest flaw in this idea is the fact that homosexuality is found in NUMEROUS other species besides humans. Now obviously, humans are a special species, unlike many other species we have a lot of mental capabilities, we can critically think & go in depth about our emotions & interaction with others. With that being said though, they're other species who don't have any where near those mental capabilities & simply live life through "survival of the fittest" (which means food, water, shelter, reproduction, is all they live for) yet homosexuality is still observed among those species. It's completely useless to them but it's still found among them. That more than anything I think proves Homosexuality is genetic.
Sep 6, 2015 I hear what you're saying bro, but just because we can observe homosexuality through other inferior species doesn't make it conclusive to genetics.
Sep 6, 2015 That's pretty conclusive unless you can explain why rats would participate in h---------- activity when it doesn't benefit their survival. Not to mention the numerous studies which have been conducted over the years & have found genetic similarities between h---------- individuals & the fact that h---------- attributes have been observed in toddlers/preschoolers.
