Oct 3, 2015

Nope im pretty sure babies are a relevant topic when discussing sex, dork

 

Oct 3, 2015

typical response from someone who has sex with babies.

 

Oct 3, 2015

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOURE DOING BY HAVING A KID IF YOU HAVE A HEREDITARY DISEASE.

ACCORDING TO YOUR LOGIC ALL PEOPLE WITH HEREDITARY DISEASES SHOULDN'T HAVE KIDS AND CAN JUST ADOPT. JUST AS HOW PEOPLE CAN OPT NOT TO REPRODUCE WITH THEIR COUSIN, PEOPLE WITH HEREDITARY DISEASES CAN OPT NOT TO f---


WHAT THE f--- ARE YOU SAYING.

 

Oct 3, 2015

Not rly

We weren't discussing statistics on what condition is riskier for babies

And again, is not the point

 

Oct 3, 2015

No Ive already addressed this, there's a point of no return with diabetes. Once you have it, that sucks, and it's s-----y, but imo its ok to have a baby. There is no point of no return with cousin-f---ing. At any point you can decide "hey maybe I shouldn't impregnate my family member"

 

Oct 3, 2015

^^

 

Oct 3, 2015

We got onto the topic of whether or not incest is ok

My argument is that its ok as long as it doesnt result in babies

This is called "responding to the topic", which falls under "staying on topic"

 

Oct 3, 2015

but if you get it half way thru life thru ur own bad choices, how is that any different than choosing to have a kid with ur cousin to you? you're doing so many f---ing mental gymnastic to make this s--- work

and at any point you can decide "hey maybe i shouldnt have kids with a heridatary disease i can give them"

you're f---ing r-----ed sometimes i swear

 

Oct 3, 2015

K so say we have two perfectly healthy adults with minimal hereditary risks right. If they're cousins, and they have babies, they're putting their babies at more risk than themselves. My problem is leaving the kid worse off than yourself.

So if you're already impaired, you really can't help it and should be allowed to have kids, just not with family or while practicing unsafe behaviors like smoking because that's an unnecesary risk you can still prevent

 

Oct 3, 2015

"once you have a crippling hereditary disease, that sucks, but its okay to have a baby roll the dice!!"

"once you fall in love with your cousin, f--- you and your 3% chance of maybe having a baby with varying degrees of birth defects. how dare you just try to bust a nut without considering what that could do to your unborn child you b------!!! just adopt, duhhhh!!!"

gn this has been an utterly r-----ed week @ sec80 smfh

 

Oct 3, 2015

"Skip disagrees with me my week sucks now"-narsh

 

Oct 3, 2015

so basically the kid doesnt deserve to have a life b/c u deem the fact they might have some food allergies down the road is too immoral

okay buddy

 

Oct 3, 2015

anyone else bored of this now

 

Oct 3, 2015

But the fact that there's a percentage at all shows it's scientifically not normal. I understand you're saying it's normal in some cultures and I believe you, but while cultural preference can be debated by different cultures, scientific evidence can not.

Anyway, sorry if you already addressed this, I was hopping pages for the main gist of this thread and stumbled upon this post.

 

Oct 3, 2015

I've stated before that my issue is with more serious problems like heart complications

 

Oct 3, 2015

such a millenial thing to say

 

Oct 3, 2015

also i never siad they dont deserve life lmao, my abotrion stance applies to all babies even healthy ones

 

Oct 3, 2015

there's a percentage of defects for "normal" births too. the fact there's a percentage at all shows it's scientifically not normal for people to reproduce.

 

Oct 3, 2015

yes you did. you said the parents should adopt instead of having the kid b/c the kid in question might be born with some birth defects. even if those can be as mild as food allergies.

 

Oct 3, 2015

i had a whole post about this and then i saw @theg say any1 else bored of this and i realized that yes yes i was indeed bored of this r-----ed convo