Jul 24, 2016 I'm allowed to add Nick Young pictures to augment what I'm already making: thorough arguments based on the substantive points. What's more, some of the quotes of mine you pulled dealt directly with the topic at hand? Like, you were tweaking Klein's quotes and trying to pass them off as his writing. You're only getting sensitive now because it's so obvious you don't have a leg to stand on re: the facts of what we're discussing. I would be perfectly happy to discuss all these things with you if you'd read and process my posts before tapping out a furious response. You haven't made a single cogent point in here. You haven't brought a single real grievance against the DNC. Do better.
Jul 24, 2016 It's not about if they compliment it or not, they are unnecessary. "Yo man, but how can X be Z if X is actually Y" "LMFAO you stupid moron, f--- off with those comparisons, you don't have enough grasp to understand the topic in hand Also it can't be because Y is actually C" Am I hitting a nerve here? Not furious, just curious. We have established before that Vox is Pro-Clinton due to their bias towards the candidate and thousands of articles telling you straight up to vote for her. Getting that on the way, your original point was (since you quoted me first) that the Russian Hackers might had manipulated the emails to push Trump in the elections, and you said it'd be naive to not see it that way. I say ok, where's the proof? You posted two theories and a tweet from an "American Foundation Fellow". I hold no grudges against any candidate, I can see why you would vote for her: What I'm arguing is that the actions behind this are not morally correct, and supporting them makes literally no sense.
Jul 24, 2016 *hits head repeatedly on desk* I don't know what to tell you bud--welcome to politics. If these emails offend you, man, you simply have no idea what that world has been like since....when, since the Greeks? This stuff is all pretty tame. Let me rephrase the question you've been dodging for like 24 hours: What in this email leak would you not expect to find in the memos of any party, any election, any country, any year?
Jul 24, 2016 Why you keep doing this? Alright, so you're acknowledging that this is not ok? Because that was basically my original comment, and it wasn't even directed towards you. I'm sure there it might be worse stuff out there, but the difference here is that it's happening now and we have rock solid evidence to confirm it. Is there anything confusing here?
Jul 24, 2016 Because you keep towing a line that's been thoroughly disproven. It's so tiresome. So you're going to continue to dodge my single, central question to you? Are you going answer somewhere between hours 25 and 48? Should I just keep asking? You want solid evidence? These emails proved the DNC was working within its sphere to help nominate the strongest candidate. The Republicans were doing this openly! On cable news! On the stump!
Jul 24, 2016 Are you sure? Last time I checked, I had the last word on the issue, and it was just that particular write up. I already answered that:
Jul 24, 2016 Lmao is this how you think life works? I told you: I work in journalism at and with some of the biggest outlets in the world. That piece was ethically rock-solid. I would go sentence-by-sentence to show you how that's the case, but I already did that and you ignored it. "Pato will you please give me one specific response" "I already answered that, by saying I wasn't going to give specifics." Come on! Stop being a weasel about this and just answer the question: What in this DNC leak suggests something in that organization that hasn't existed in each party going back generations--or in the RNC as we speak? Pushing one candidate over another? Check. Trying to spin news stories? Check (and how is that even objectionable?) You still haven't highlighted one single thing about this that offends your delicate constitution. Let's hear it. What's got you so riled up?
Jul 24, 2016 It is pretty much all about her so I would venture to say she was indirectly involved somehow.
Jul 24, 2016 But again, what's the point of that question? If a new thread popped up saying "RNC emails leaked, confirms Trump wants to build concentraton camps", then I'd react almost the exact same way. I already said thousands of times that I do not support neither party, so why do you keep asking this?
Jul 24, 2016 Blair, if this were the RNC, you'd be (maybe rightly) calling anyone offended a p---- lol You said you want to have a civil conversation about this, right? No grandstanding, no insults? Okay, let's have it: What, specifically, was revealed in this leak that has caused you to be morally offended? So you're saying you'd react "almost the same way" concentration camps and...these? You think a Comm dept spinning press coverage is comparable to......................concentration camps?
Jul 24, 2016 Really? That's your best defense? By the way I didn't even say I cared about the emails. It's nothing anyone with a brain and a slight understanding of politics didn't know was already going on. It just discredits people in public, which has been happening a lot lately, with even more denial to go with it.
Jul 24, 2016 What, that this is all pageantry and performative outrage? Yes, that's my position. There's nothing in here that galling or that unusual.
Jul 24, 2016 I edited and added more to my post after you responded. I think we pretty much agree, but she's still a (terrible) liar
Jul 24, 2016 The first tweet in OP resuming the content found in the emails is the reason of my disgust. lmao pls don't go this route, you know exactly what I mean with that sentence.
Jul 24, 2016 Okay, yeah, I agree with this more or less completely. It will be a serious political hit and will alter the election drastically, despite revealing almost nothing that damning.
Jul 24, 2016 sounds to me like people that determine our wellbeing broke the law once again but followers will be followers and disregard it nothing new
