Mar 7, 2017 Late last year, it was revealed that, despite the finality of Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End, Naughty Dog would be bringing another Uncharted game to the world with Uncharted: The Lost Legacy. The upcoming title is the featured cover story on the latest issue of Game Informer, which you can check out below, and in their story, Naughty Dog co-president Evan Wells insisted the developer isn’t planning an expansive Nathan Drake-free Uncharted franchise. “I would say that Naughty Dog doing an Uncharted after this is unlikely. I would never say never, but we’ve got The Last of Us Part II on our plates and there’s so much other stuff that [we want to explore]. It’d be hard. If we magically had that two-team, three-team studio, sure – it’d be great to keep doing it. We really love the franchise, but the studio has limited resources and lots of other ideas. I’d say the likelihood is low.” Uncharted: The Lost Legacy is set to feature Chloe Frazer from Uncharted 2: Among Thieves and Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception teaming up with Nadine Ross, one of the villains from Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End. The pair team up in order to recover a fabled ancient Indian artifact and keep it out of the hands of a ruthless war profiteer. Together, they’ll venture deep into the mountains of India in search of the legendary artifact. Along the way, they’ll learn to work together to unearth the mystery of the artifact, fight their way through fierce opposition, and prevent the region from falling into chaos. The title will be available as a standalone game on store shelves and for digital download. Players that already purchased the Uncharted 4 Digital Deluxe Edition or the Explorer’s Pack, will get Uncharted: The Lost Legacy as a download at launch. Read more at http://www.comingsoon.net/games/news/822573-dont-expect-another-uncharted-game-after-the-lost-legacy
Mar 7, 2017 That's good. Great series, but it's time to move on. One of the great things about Sony/Naughty Dog Unlike other companies
Mar 7, 2017 Like Rockstar ? Is it really a great thing? I know you wan't to say "Quality > Quantity" but ..... Let's look at the last few console zelda games on metacritic for example BOTW: 98 Skyward Sword: 93 (considered to be a low point in the series) Twilight Princess: 95 Wind Waker: 96 Majora's Mask: 95 Ocarina of time: 99 (best reviewed game of all time) And you'd be surprised how different these games are from each other. I know you aren't trying to throw shade at nintendo , and most likely mean ea or square enix, (Those zelda games are literally 1-2 per console generation) but if you make a game that's critically acclaimed and you can make another one that has that has just as much critical acclaim while bringing something new to the table, then why the f--- not? Nintendo just launched an under powered console with an experimental concept almost exclusively off the hype of Zelda and Mario.
Mar 7, 2017 omfg lol. bro, you really gonna take reviews seriously? Or use them to prove a point? it's been known for a while now sites like IGN/metacritic etc, are paid to review these games. they also get given early copies to review and if their reviews are less than 9/10 or 90/100, they are blacklisted from whichever company they rated poorly.
Mar 7, 2017 Also pretty weird that you'd jump in and type a pretty long post defending Nintendo even though no one mentioned their name
Mar 7, 2017 They need to make another Crash game Bandicoot beastiality needs to become an accepted mainstream concept
Mar 7, 2017 don't just blindly throw shade around . Wasn't defending anyone, i was giving an exception to the rule. He made a statement i disagree with, i gave Nintendo as an example. Was using them to show a degree of consistency really, but early reviews are needed for the review to come out before the game. And while i can't say paid reviews don't happen, i used zelda because i've played those games, so i can personally vouch for their quality, but i think the score of the average reviewer has more weight in an argument that my own opinion
Mar 7, 2017 are you aware that the user reviews for BotW are 7.5 on metacritic? the lowest a Zelda game has ever scored? I'd prefer to take your bias and opinion on a game, over a reviewer that's paid2praise a game. just look at BotW -metascore of 98 -71/71 reviews all positive game gets released -user score of 7.5 Like, Horizon Zero Dawn has a better user score atm lol.
Mar 7, 2017 Metacritic scores are s--- and meaningless but let's not act like user reviews aren't just as unreliable. Everyone has an agenda, would bet the people leaving "1/10 worst game of all time reviews" are trolls memeing for a reaction out of Nintendo fans.
Mar 7, 2017 yeah but those trolls (for the most part imo) are averaged out by the 10/10 reviews. you could just as easily say a lot of 10/10 reviews are children/autists/fangays that want their game to sell. Like half the "10/10" ratings are from eastern europeans regurgitating the same s--- about a game, that they would for a new Eminem album. Not to mention most people who drop 10/10 perfect scores have no idea. I'd imagine real reviews would rate BotW anywhere between 6-9/10 which would give an average rating of around 7-8/10. But instead the reviews are 80% 10/10, 10% 1/10, 10% actual reviews. IMO userscore is a lot better than say, 71/71 100% positive paid2review scores.
Mar 7, 2017 Yes i am . But did you actually read them . lets do some math, if a game has 4 review scores right, and lets say......3 people give it a 10/10, and then the other guy does this or this What does the averages score become? Yeah but seriously, the user reviews are literally hundreds of 10's and 9's with interlaced 0's .
Mar 7, 2017 Sorry Coco but s--- like this Factors into the score and no one with half a brain would rate this game a 0 Trolls make user scores irrelevant and even if he simply disagrees with the entire structure of the game, which this paragraph seems to, there's no way in f--- his personal bias of what a Zelda game should be is justification for a 0... take that 7.5 and shove it up your a---
