Jul 27, 2016 Donald Trump famously said that he could s---t someone in the middle of 5th Avenue and his voters wouldn't care. Now he seems determined to test that theory. Today Trump encouraged Russia to commit espionage against Hillary Clinton, all because it might help him win the election. Keep in mind that Trump's entire campaign is predicated on the fact that Hillary's private servers might have had sensitive national security secrets--so by his own logic, he's willing to grossly compromise national security if it gives him a bump in the polls. @Lamont is defending Trump's actions tooth-and-nail. It doesn't matter that public servers can be, in many cases, easier to hack; it doesn't matter that Hillary has already been cleared of wrongdoing by the FBI. He can't be swayed! Very steadfast, very robotic. Lamont has stuck with Trump through many things, like a good lil soldier: -- He wasn't swayed when Trump said he'd only defend NATO allies if they were financially solvent, which could trigger a world war. -- He jumped for joy when Trump said he'd remove sanctions on Russia over its actions in Crimea, or when he got the GOP to change their platform to leave open the possibility of an invaded Ukraine. -- Lamont wasn't shaken when Trump didn't know the difference between Hamas and Hezbollah. -- He didn't bat an eye when Trump said he'd force the American military to commit war crimes. -- He wasn't upset when Trump advocated for the use of torture, saying "Even if it doesn't work they probably deserve it anyway." -- Lamont was perfectly happy when Trump noted ISIS raping women and murdering children and promised the U.S. would "do the same" in turn -- He questions Hillary's foreign policy judgment, but is all fine and dandy when Trump won't rule out using nuclear weapons in Europe -- It's not even just America! Trump called for a global nuclear rearmament, and Lamont is on board -- He's fine with Trump saying he'll violate the Geneva Convention to forcibly steal oil from other nations -- Trump believes Hillary Clinton will "erase the second amendment," which she doesn't have the authority to do as president--a worrying lack of understanding when it comes to government. But he's on board with Trump saying he'll institute the death penalty for anyone accused of murdering a police officer. (Also impossible.) -- Speaking of constitutional amendments, Trump thinks lethal injection is "too comfortable" and wants a more painful method instituted. Obvious violation of the bill of rights. Lamont is silent. -- Trump expresses and then doubles down on Trump fawning over Saddam Hussein; Lamont is more worried about Debbie Wasserman Schultz. -- When Trump tweeted an anti-semitic image that was traced back to a neo-Nazi message board, Trump thought people were being too sensitive. When a DNC staffer asked whether Bernie Sanders was Jewish or an atheist, Lamont thought it was the end of democracy. -- Former CIA director says Trump might be working in league with Russia to damage America. Lamont is happy! -- The ACLU compiles a list of 28 Trump proposals that are unconstitutional. Lamont: "He's qualified!" I could keep going, but you get the point. So my question: what would it take to get Lamont to turn on his beloved leader? Pls post your hypothesis below. @captain awesome @M Solo @Swizz @Enigma @Radeem
Jul 27, 2016 i dont endorse/agree with everything he said so you're wasting time listing the bat s--- crazy things trump has said. for the millionth time, they both s---, and are both corrupt for different reasons.
Jul 27, 2016 But what would he have to do for you to stop robotically defending him? Drop a baby onto train tracks? Maybe the baby was an illegal immigrant! Beat up a grandmother? She had an abortion in 1944!
Jul 27, 2016 lol.. this was thread worthy? huge waste of time dude. I'd rather talk about top 5 atlanta rappers, which u ignored
Jul 27, 2016 thing is im not defending him.. i like some things about him, but he is not a perfect candidate, and like hillary, he lies all the time and is full of s---. and for the millionth time, ive sh---ed on him multiple times on this forum alone.. like what he said about mccain.. huge insult and directly contradicts his "trump will take care of vets" status. you point out the same flaws in both candidates. both flip flop horrendously.
Jul 27, 2016 What about the other thread you were just posting in where you were defending Trump's call for Russian espionage to win an election
Jul 27, 2016 yeah thats one thing, that i agree with. not just to win the election. but because hillary is corrupt and deserves to get further exposed. if they had dirt on trump, or dubya, i would wanna know.
Jul 27, 2016 the irony of a hillbot telling me i'm robotically defending trump when I constantly say how inconsistent trump is.. wow
Jul 27, 2016 tell us which statements you reject. and what would it take from trump for you to refute him. like did you actually read pauls point/think???
Jul 27, 2016 also this thread is hilarious. it's missing one or two references to why eminem sucks tho
Jul 27, 2016 I think arguing with you and others is fun just for the sake of a debate. I don't think anyone here thinks highly of Trump and/or Clinton
Jul 27, 2016 You can't drive someone away from doing something when your life's motto is "the end justifies the means". Lamont hates Clinton and will do and say everything to not get her elected. Just like Trump... I'm personally terrified that there may be millions of people who think like him. Accussing Clinton of being corrupted without any discernible evidence is good, but openly supports the idea of other country interfering in the national elections.... Wasn't Trump complaining about sovereignty at some point?
Jul 27, 2016 I didn't add anything to the discussion, but Im really terrified about the future of the world. First brexit, the refugee crisis, now the possibillity of Trump being president... and the right-wing parties are rising in Europe. Jesus Christ.
Jul 27, 2016 I don't think too many people actually LIKE Donald Trump, they view him as the lesser of 2 evils much in the same way a lot of Democrats view Hillary... the sad thing is people actually SUPPORTING Hillary and thinking she would be a great leader...LMAOOOOOOOOO...the same exact question could be asked of those sheep...like what does Hillary realistically have to do for people to be like "uhhhh, f--- this b----"...
Jul 27, 2016 I sincerely wonder if people who see the candidates on equal footing have ever read a newspaper
