Sep 6, 2015 Its the same with all trilogy's, the original star wars movies, dark knight, the godfather, and the matrix. All have the first two movies to be considered classics but the third one ends up flopping, why is that?
Sep 6, 2015 Because the third movies in the franchises you mentioned are terrible. There are plenty of others where the third is just as good or better.
Sep 6, 2015 Hey I thought return of the Jedi was pretty good. And what are the other trilogy's that are better?
Sep 6, 2015 Revenge of the Sith is by far the best of the prequel trilogy for whatever that's worth. Return of the King Toy Story 3 Pusher III Mission Impossible III Three Colors: Red Army of Darkness Lady Vengeance The Bourne Ultimatum
Sep 6, 2015 Not calling it a flop I consider return of the Jedi a good conclusion to the original star wars. But most fans from what I hear don't like it because of well.... ewoks
Sep 6, 2015 You can't have 2 movies "hype" up this imperial army, only to have them get their s--- pushed in by 2 foot tall furballs with sticks.
Sep 6, 2015 I actually like a lot The Godfather III. Before Midnight is possibly the best third part ever. Die Hard 3 is the second best of the franchise. The Bourne Ultimatum is the best one and one of the greatest action films ever, and im a Dark Knight Rises defendor Can't remember another good third part. I dont count films such as the dollars trilogy
Sep 6, 2015 But that's what's makes it a good movie, the big villains being taken down by the good guys against all odds. But that's my opinion.
Sep 7, 2015 I don't think that the movies are neccessarily bad, it's just that when the first movie is released it creates a 'base' that the sequels, according to many is, are supposed to follow. If they don't do it people consider them bad. Just because they are not the exact same movie as the first one it's 'bad', which I think is pretty dumb. It doesn't neccessarily have to be like this though, it's just what I think.
